We as an OPPOSITION says that...

According to the SAMONTE, 1970..

The Administrative reform can be defined as to make the administrative system a more effective instrument to bring about political, equality, social injustice and economic growth.

We as an opposition party, think that the REFORMATION is needed to develop our country. So we support the REFORMATIOn based on proof and evedince thaat we think the REFORMATION was success and still have to continue its process.

With regard to the government party, actually they should support the idea of REFORMATION. All the ideas that they given are not relevent because...

1960s

Evidence of Administrative Reform in Malaysia

1. Upgrade the standard of living in economic status of rural area
- Government introduced the Red Bode System to enable the administration system to respond quickly and efficiently to the increasing demands of rural development.

2. Promised the development and stability for the people of Malaysia
- introduced First Malaysia Plan until now
- introduced Development Administration Unit (DAU)
- training and Career Development Division in Public Service Department
- established Public Service Commission

1970s

1. To eradicate poverty
- formulated of New Economic Policy (NEP) until now
- created of UDA, SEDC, SADC, DARA, MARA, MIDA

2. Training
- Establishment of INTAN

3. Strengthen the public service
- establishment of MAMPU

4. Complaint by people
- Public Complaint Bureau


1980s

1. Wearing of identification tags for government servant for example punch-card system

2. Relied on fast growing industrial and service sector

3. Improve the service. Example Privatization


1990s

1. NEP replacement by National Development Policy

2. Civil Service Day (Quality Day) (31st Oct)

3. Improve service
- Civil Service Innovational Award
- Client Charter

4. Technology
- Multimedia Super Corridor and Cybercity

As a conclusion, administrative improvements and reforms in Malaysia have been taking place in the public service since the early sixties, a few years after Merdeka (Independence). Administrative leaders such as Tun Abdul Razak and Dr. Mahathir who were supported by the top leadership of the bureaucracy, played a ground-breaking role in the country’s successful reform programme. There seemed to be a meeting of minds between the political leadership and the top civil servants to bring about changes in the administrative machinery and deliver goods and services efficiently to the people. The politicians have a mission to improve the lot of the poor and the underprivileged as well as that of the citizenry as a whole. The civil servants, many of whom came from a humble background, also supported the mission to develop the country both socially and economically. This may not be true in some other developing countries but in Malaysia the background and training of the civil servants helped sensitise them to the common problems of the Third World such as poverty, illiteracy, and disease. In tandem with the political leaders, they set about to deliver the fruits of development to the population at large.